On April 5, 2024, Colombia formally announced to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that it was retracting its Declaration of intervention related to the case concerning the Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip, specifically regarding the suit filed by South Africa against Israel.
Colombia’s Withdrawal Context
Colombia’s Foreign Ministry has confirmed that this withdrawal does not alter its status as a State Party to the Genocide Convention, nor does it impact the legal obligations Colombia has previously committed to under this international instrument. Despite the withdrawal from the case, Colombia remains bound by the principles enshrined in the Convention and continues to uphold its commitment to prevent and punish any acts of genocide.
Reactions from Israeli Officials
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar welcomed Colombia’s decision, expressing gratitude towards President Abelardo De la Espriella for retracting what he characterized as a “false and malicious lawsuit” against Israel initiated during the prior administration. This acknowledgment highlights a significant diplomatic shift, as Israel aims to reinforce its international relations, especially with Colombia.
Sa’ar noted that the friendship between Israel and Colombia is “stronger than ever.” He has publicly discussed this matter with Colombian Foreign Minister Omar Bula Escobar during a recent meeting in Washington, demonstrating ongoing dialogue aimed at strengthening bilateral ties.
Colombia’s Diplomatic Shift
The move to withdraw from the ICJ case aligns with President De la Espriella’s broader strategy to reverse the diplomatically strained policies established by his predecessor, Gustavo Petro. In his recent inauguration, De la Espriella emphasized the immediate restoration of full diplomatic relations with Israel, confirming a landmark decision to relocate the Colombian embassy to Jerusalem. This profound gesture indicates Colombia’s commitment to fostering a closer relationship with Israel, further cemented by its recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights.
Despite the diplomatic thaw, South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) has not publicly addressed Colombia’s withdrawal. Previously, they indicated that this development would not hinder their ongoing legal challenge against Israel. As the situation continues to develop, the dynamics of international law and diplomatic relations in this context warrant close observation for further implications.