The New School, known for its progressive stance, is under scrutiny for its handling of incidents affecting its Jewish student body. Despite claims of fostering a safe environment, the institution continues to employ Corinna Mullin, a controversial political science professor with a history of involvement in anti-Israel protests during her time at the City University of New York (CUNY). This decision has raised concerns and questions regarding the school’s commitment to inclusivity.
Controversial Background of Professor Corinna Mullin
Mullin, who specializes in anticolonialism and is critical of Western values, was a prominent figure at a protest in April 2024, held on the City College of New York campus. This demonstration resulted in significant damage, including a fire in the science building that incurred $3 million in costs, leading to her arrest. Mullin’s visibility in these events earned her the title of one of the “fired four,” referring to adjunct professors dismissed in the summer of 2025 for their advocacy of Palestine, coinciding with a congressional hearing on antisemitism in educational institutions.
Although she was eventually reinstated in January, it remains unclear whether Mullin has engaged in any teaching activities at CUNY since her return. Her name was notably absent from faculty listings, prompting further speculation about her role at the university following her controversial past.
The New School’s Uncertain Commitment to Jewish Students
The New School recently drew criticism after its student senate voted to sanction its Hillel chapter, marking the first time a student government had taken such action against a Hillel in the United States. Officials from the university have insisted that this move was not within the senate’s authority and emphasized their commitment to creating an inclusive atmosphere where all students feel respected and valued, regardless of their backgrounds.
The controversy surrounding Hillel centered on claims that the group’s funding was linked to trips sending students to volunteer on military bases in Israel. Hillel representatives have argued that such assertions misrepresent the organization, which largely operates independently of student fee funding.
Ongoing Tensions and the Future of Student Organizations
Michael Valdes, a graduating MFA student and a Hillel member, voiced concerns over the implications of the student senate’s actions on Jewish identity on campus. He emphasized that while individuals are entitled to diverging opinions on Israel and international relations, these disagreements should not serve as a rationale for excluding a student organization from campus life. He also clarified that only a minor portion of Hillel’s funding originated from student fees and that the organization has managed to uphold its activities without disruption.
As discussions unfold, the New School acknowledges the need to closely examine the events that led to the student senate’s sanctions and any necessary administrative responses. The university is tasked with balancing the promotion of a politically diverse environment while ensuring that all student groups feel safe and welcome on campus.
In summary, the New School’s current predicament highlights the complexities surrounding free speech, advocacy, and inclusivity within academic institutions. As the institution navigates through these challenging dynamics, it remains crucial to uphold a commitment to fostering a campus climate where every student, regardless of their beliefs, can thrive.